They say all good things must come to an end. If so, does it mean that this blog is good?
Over the past eight weeks, I’ve touched on a number of issues that are close to my heart. Politics, religion, space, just to name a few. Well, actually that’s pretty much all of them. Unless you count my motivations. Anyway, perhaps I could have added my hatred of racists and sexists (and other negative things that end with -ists) to that list, if I had known earlier that reflections weren’t supposed to be about the class. But never mind, no point crying over spilt milk. We should always look to the future, so I guess it’s only fair to leave my last reflection to be about the passion I am chasing right now. Filmmaking.
Filmmaking isn’t exactly a profession that you would associate the word ’stable’ with. In fact, you would probably be called crazy to pursue a filmmaking career in Singapore. Thankfully, I didn’t receive much flak from friends or family, although I am pretty sure my mother would have preferred I undertake a more professional line of work such as a career in law.
I guess the stigma that surrounds filmmaking in Singapore is that not many people have succeeded in this line. Jack Neo today, stands as the only Singaporean to actually make money from his films. Pioneers like Eric Khoo and Royston Tan, as far as their successes have taken them to Cannes and Sundance, still have not managed to the break ice with the general public.
Comparing Jack Neo with Royston Tan is like comparing a durian with a truffle cake. The durian may look ugly on the outside, but on the inside, it’s everyone’s favorite fruit. The truffle on the other hand has the exquisite beauty of all fine things, but requires an extremely acquired taste. Basically, if you didn’t get my point, I was trying to put across that the general public and film critics don’t usually agree with each other.
Take Spiderman 3 for instance, it garnered a lowly 2 stars from movie critics, yet made over $150 million during it’s opening weekend. Where’s the sanity?!
So finally, here comes the big hoo-hah that I’ve been drum rolling to, who does the filmmaker create the movie for? The public or the critic?
I think it’s an important point for future filmmakers to ponder, especially my classmates, since although we should make movies that are great, we should also worry how we’re going to feed ourselves.
Mister Ryan posted an intersting article on his blog a few weeks back from the LA times. It basically said that hollywood’s most potential directors are opting for the easy money in sequels and trilogies instead of sticking to creating memorable one shot movies such as Memento and The Usual Suspects.
Personally I don’t have anything against sequels or trilogies; I just don’t think they’ve been that successful so far. Although Pirates of the Caribbean started as a brilliant movie, the two sequels just plummeted into an endless abyss. The Matrix trilogy as artistic as it was, got drowned by it’s own story. And although most people would argue that the Lord Of The Rings is the best example of an exception. I simply slam back and say that Tolkien never meant for the Lord Of The Rings to be a trilogy. Some idiot in America screwed it up when he printed the damn book.
But anyway, back to my point, although trilogies aren’t that great, they do wonders at the box office. And you have to remember, it’s not just one movie that reaps in the rewards, it’s all three movies in the series.
On the other hand, you’ve got your directors like socrcese who loves making movies of different themes and genres. They don’t have so much fan appeal, but they add so much quality to the film archive.
So… Back to the question… Which one do you please? Do you please the critic? Or do you please the audience? By now, hopefully, most of you would know by now that I prefer taking the middle ground. Basically…. The politically correct answer. I think it is possible to create movies that have great storylines but still have that blockbuster approach. (That obviously rakes in the big bucks.)I’m looking for balance.
Back to Lord Of The Rings. I think it’s the perfect movie that shows this balance. It satisfies the critics. And it satisfies the audience. In fact, the word satisfy would be an understatement. It simply blew the critics away, and it blew up the box office.
I’ve always thought of the perfect film needs to follow 3 simple points.
1. The story has to be something new
We’ve watched many films. We want to see a story that has a great plot, great characters, great diction, great though, great spectacle and great melody. But at the same time we also want to see new stuff. Add a bit of variety to the movie cupboard.
2. The story has to have a moral to it.
Something I like to see in movies, is when they take a current issue and work it into their story. It makes you look at the film from a deeper perspective and it’s also a great feeling to figure that perspective out.
3. You got to make it beautiful.
Here’s the point that I think many filmmakers tend to forget. Film is an art. It is an artistic expression. It should look beautiful. Everything in your film should look artistic.
Look at those three points. And then look at Lord Of The Rings. It works.
To me, the real art of filmmaking is finding that balance. When you can create a film that can satisfy everyone. Or almost everyone. Then you’ve succeeded. I can’t wait for location production.